If there are any lawyers out there who are into civil justice, then have I got a career-making proposition for you. One of the most...
Burly cases that you're likely to come across.
Or if you know any lawyers, you could please pass this on to them, it's really for them to read, so just pass it on till it finds one.
If you (the lawyer) are really, truly desiring justice, justice in the name of your friends, your family, the children you will one day look back on as a good thing that happened to your life, if you are truly interested in the justice of the human being everywhere, then
I have a challenge for you.
To bring a case against the corporation that is THE CITY OF LONDON. If there is a name for bringing a case against someone for due cause of withholding information which lead to the cause of unecessary psychological, emotional and physical harm, that's the one we're talking about here. By falsely leading humans everywhere to believe that their names are their own to use and imposing unjust taxes upon us as a result. For witholding the facts that cause people to theive from the "government of CANADA" or the CROWN or some other such nation, say, you may apologize to the company \of the UNITED STATES for stealing for so long, property which was given as a temporary gift, and promising that we will never steal again from the government, but we simply didn't know.
We promise that this is the only reason why we thought that giving them more money would solve the problem. We thought more of our hard earned money was a suitible gift, seeing as they work with it and all. So we paid taxes, we're sorry, we wouldn't have done that if we knew they didn't like us using the names given to us at our registrated births through our birth certificates. They must see how, because they didn't tell us, we didn't know that we were unlawfully using "STATE" or "CROWN" properties. So if you could apologize on behalf of every company that follows this rather underhanded, abusive business methodology, most likely ones that can be found in the bed of a banker.
Coincidentally, Follow the banker far enough up the ladder and see how he also owns JAMAICA or part of NATO, or has his hand in the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, or some other organization which could cause conflicts of interest, by the simple act of controlling the BANK of those companies. In fact, actually you might benefit more (especially to pay for court fees) if you turn it into a case of THEFT as per a "withholding of information" or some other such charge.
You can tell them to stop using the clever ruse of naming all their banks "FEDERAL" or "NATIONAL', by the way. Posing as a government run company, all keen to manage OUR money and all, pretending that they're doing useful things likebalancing out the economy and such, but we all know the truth. We know they're privatized, it's starting to feel like an insult to our intelligence that they think we still believe theyre run by the government, so let's just have them divert their energy to more useful pursiuts than farce.
Like NOT creating more money than there is in existence,
like NOT adjusting inflation and commodity prices as they see fit.
And NOT spending so much time and money investing in "defence" companies, as it is this branch that does phsical harm.
And we might as well start with the governmnet and how theyre' accusing us that we all want to pay for the wars through our taxes, and we want someone who has a take on things, one who doesn't assume so much. Also assuming that by living in a certain place, we immediately align with the political and combative values and ideologies of that "country" by the simple act of binding us under one flag against another flag, is folly. In doing so, we are causing others physiological and psychological AND physical harm. We can then have a case about how we're tired of the banks making descisions for us whcih, in effect, extend our hands in action against a people we have no quarrel with to enforce a "unity of all peace" and other UN - mandated values. Or are they UN-permitted...??
And against our government having secret facilities in the wilds of alaska which withhold valuable technologies which could be used for the betterment and development of the human race, and are instead technologies being used on such a proportedly ridiculous cause as "toying with the weather". To seriously waste our tax dollars on such an infertile act when there is social development, healthcare and infrastructure, libraries and universities to be financially supported, is mind-numbing. And the suggestion that it can be used as a weapon might also be a fruitful venture. Besides, the banks have a lot of money, so they won't feel bad about giving EVERYONE on the planet back their slave-wages.
So let's say that turns out to be a few more counts than I said, but I also said it would be challenging.
Right then. who's got the stones?
No comments:
Post a Comment